Evals for agentic products

Evals that evolve with your agent

Prompts, models, and orchestration change every week. Static eval suites go stale and miss the regressions that ship anyway. Tessary reads your codebase and production traces, synthesizes a working eval pipeline, and keeps it current as your agent changes, so you catch regressions from any change before your users report them.

Setup
Run the evals plugin in your repo. First graders in minutes, no eval file to start from.
Catches
Regressions from prompt edits, model bumps, code refactors, and infra changes.
Runs on
Your provider keys. Every grader is transparent and yours to keep.
Built for
CTOs and engineers with an agent already serving real production volume.
The Problem

Static evals cannot keep pace with a moving agent.

Agent-based products change faster than the eval approaches built for slow-moving software. Golden datasets, manual annotation, and dashboard uploads go stale faster than teams can maintain them, so changes ship blind and regressions surface only after someone complains.

~1 day

of engineering time per agent change today: uploading traces to a dashboard, reviewing them by hand, and running ad-hoc spot checks

Any change

a prompt edit, a model version bump, a code refactor, or an infra update can break a flow nobody meant to touch

After the fact

most regressions surface through user complaints and support tickets, not before the change ships

How It Works

From your codebase to a working eval pipeline

No blank eval file, no hand-built failure list. The pipeline is synthesized from your code, calibrated on your traces, and re-synthesized as the product evolves.

  1. Point it at your repo

    Run the evals plugin inside your own codebase. It reads your code and, when you connect them, your production traces. Nothing leaves your environment by default.

  2. Get a synthesized pipeline

    Tessary finds every place your product calls a model, classifies what each call is doing, and writes graders with rubrics for the ways each one can fail. You get a failure taxonomy specific to your product, not a generic checklist.

  3. Curate and connect your traces

    Accept, reject, or edit graders in the platform, then connect your trace source. Each run judges real production traffic and records a verdict per grader.

  4. Catch regressions as the product moves

    Re-synthesis runs as your agent changes. When a prompt edit, model bump, or refactor breaks a flow, the regression shows up against the baseline instead of in a support ticket.

What You Get

Eval infrastructure that stays current

The graders are an output you can read and keep. The value that compounds is the synthesis, the taxonomy, and the curation history that grows with your product.

Synthesis from your code

Connect your repo and get call sites, failure modes, and graders. You do not start from a blank eval file or a generic template.

Regression detection across any change

Compare against a baseline after every change, including the ones that look unrelated to the agent layer.

A failure taxonomy that grows

A hierarchical map of how your product fails, specific to you, that compounds with every curation decision you make.

Transparent, portable graders

Read every grader. Run them on your own provider keys. Keep them if you ever stop using Tessary.

Runs on your production traces

Connect Braintrust or Langfuse and judge real production traffic, so evals reflect real usage instead of synthetic data.

Works across providers

Your agent does not have to run on one model vendor, and neither does the eval pipeline that watches it.

Who It Is For

Built for the person who owns agent quality.

Production agents

Tessary is for the CTO or engineer who owns agent quality and gets blamed when it breaks. It fits teams with an agent already serving real volume, where a regression has already cost something, not pre-product teams still shaping a first prototype.

FAQ

Questions about agent evals

Any change that can move your agent’s behavior: prompt edits, model version bumps, orchestration changes, code refactors, and infrastructure updates. The point is catching breakage from changes that look unrelated to the agent layer, not just prompt diffs.
No. Tessary reads your codebase and synthesizes the first working pipeline: call sites, failure modes, and graders with rubrics. You curate from there by accepting, rejecting, or editing what it proposes.
Graders are transparent. You can read every one, run them on your own provider keys, and take them with you if you stop using Tessary. The product is the synthesis, the failure taxonomy, and the ongoing curation, not a black box.
Connect Braintrust or Langfuse as a trace source. Each run pulls real production spans and records a verdict per grader, so evals reflect real usage rather than synthetic data.
The plugin produces a first set of graders in minutes. The goal is your first real regression caught within the first week, and engineering time per agent change dropping from about a day to under 30 minutes.
No. Your agent can run on multiple model providers, and the eval pipeline is designed to work across them rather than locking you to one vendor’s dashboard.
Get Started

Stop shipping agent changes blind.

Connect your code, get a working eval pipeline, and keep it current as your agent evolves. Catch the next regression before your users do.

Start with your repoBring your own provider keys. The graders are yours to keep.