Does an LLM judge know when it's unsure?

An LLM judge can flag its own uncertainty somewhat reliably: a March 2026 study of seven LLM graders found that asking a model to self-report its confidence produced a lower mean calibration error, 0.166, than sampling the same prompt five times and voting on the result, 0.229, at a fifth of the inference cost.

The catch is in the shape of the scores. Across that study’s self-reported and token-probability methods, 86 percent of predictions landed above 0.8 confidence and only 0.62 percent below 0.2, so a judge that’s mostly right and one that’s mostly wrong hand back confidence scores that look nearly identical. The useful decision threshold isn’t near the middle you’d expect.

Self-consistency still earns a place as a second check: run a verdict several times, and a judge that flips on repeat sampling is telling you the item sits near its decision boundary, independent of what any human said about it.

sources

keep reading

More on this.

Two ways to run Tessary.

Tessary is an open-source agent reliability platform. Cloud and self-hosted run the same workflow on the OpenTelemetry traces your agent already emits.

Tessary Cloud

We host it for you. Send your first trace with nothing to deploy and no model key.

what's includedper organization
traces
10,000 per calendar month
stored trace data
1 GB
retention
30 days
model credit
$10, one-time, for triage and root-cause analysis
credit card
not required

Self-hosted Tessary

Run the open-source code on your own infrastructure with one command. Add your own model key for triage and root-cause analysis.

Self-host Tessary for me by following https://github.com/tessaryai/tessary/blob/main/setup.md

docker compose -f oci://docker.io/tessaryai/tessary:compose up -d -y