Does running more LLM judges on the same trace reduce error?

Not by much. A 2026 study called “Nine Judges, Two Effective Votes” found a panel of nine frontier LLM judges carried only about two judges’ worth of independent signal, since models trained similarly tend to fail on the same items. The panel’s accuracy landed 8 to 22 percentage points below nine truly independent votes, and the single best judge matched or beat the full panel.

The bottleneck is correlation between judges, not the aggregation method: models trained on overlapping data and instruction-tuned in similar ways tend to fail on the same inputs. Measuring a grader’s own accuracy still needs a labeled set to check against; stacking judges without that check just multiplies the cost of being wrong together.

sources

keep reading

More on this.

Two ways to run Tessary.

Tessary is an open-source agent reliability platform. Cloud and self-hosted run the same workflow on the OpenTelemetry traces your agent already emits.

Tessary Cloud

We host it for you. Send your first trace with nothing to deploy and no model key.

what's includedper organization
traces
10,000 per calendar month
stored trace data
1 GB
retention
30 days
model credit
$10, one-time, for triage and root-cause analysis
credit card
not required

Self-hosted Tessary

Run the open-source code on your own infrastructure with one command. Add your own model key for triage and root-cause analysis.

Self-host Tessary for me by following https://github.com/tessaryai/tessary/blob/main/setup.md

docker compose -f oci://docker.io/tessaryai/tessary:compose up -d -y