What's the difference between a LangGraph workflow and a LangGraph agent?

A workflow’s control flow is code you wrote; an agent’s control flow is a decision the model makes at runtime. In a LangGraph workflow, edges are predetermined: you decided in advance which node runs after which, so the graph always follows one of a fixed set of paths. In an agent, the model itself decides which tool to call or which node to go to next, so the same graph can take a path nobody wrote down in advance.

That difference is what changes what needs grading. A workflow’s paths are enumerable, so you can write one eval per path and know you’ve covered the graph. An agent adds a decision you can’t enumerate in advance: whether the model picked the right next step given what it had seen so far, the same kind of check a mis-routed handoff needs in any multi-agent system. Grading a workflow means checking each node’s output; grading an agent means also checking the routing decision itself.

sources

keep reading

More on this.

Two ways to run Tessary.

Tessary is an open-source agent reliability platform. Cloud and self-hosted run the same workflow on the OpenTelemetry traces your agent already emits.

Tessary Cloud

We host it for you. Send your first trace with nothing to deploy and no model key.

what's includedper organization
traces
10,000 per calendar month
stored trace data
1 GB
retention
30 days
model credit
$10, one-time, for triage and root-cause analysis
credit card
not required

Self-hosted Tessary

Run the open-source code on your own infrastructure with one command. Add your own model key for triage and root-cause analysis.

Self-host Tessary for me by following https://github.com/tessaryai/tessary/blob/main/setup.md

docker compose -f oci://docker.io/tessaryai/tessary:compose up -d -y